Popular Posts

Total Pageviews

Friday, September 12, 2025

Albinoni and Bach “What I Have Achieved by Industry Anyone Else Can Also Achieve”

Tomaso Albinoni

Tomaso Albinoni

Tomaso Albinoni (1671-1750) and Johann Sebastian Bach (1685-1750) were contemporaries, but they never actually met. While Albinoni was at home on various Italian and international operatic stages, Bach never traveled far away from his native community in North-Germany. We do know, however, that Bach did come in contact with the music of various Italian masters, and that his scholarly confrontation with these new styles decisively shaped his musical language and understanding. A scholar has suggested that “the best outside movements of Albinoni’s later concertos are remarkably like some of those by Bach, who benefited from the study of these works.” That similarity is found in some interesting variants of the common Albinoni approach to ritornello form, one, which Bach, took over into his works. Several movements from Bach’s Brandenburg Concertos “show clear signs of having been written under the influence of the concertos for one and two oboes of Albinoni’s Opus VII.”

The young Bach, Weimar, 1715

The young Bach, Weimar, 1715

While we can certainly hear some of the similarities of structure and tonal organization, how did Bach actually got his hands on the Albinoni scores? Two possible scenarios have been suggested. In the autumn of 1717 Bach traveled from Weimar to Dresden. The crown prince of Saxony had recently returned from an extended journey to Italy, having spent almost one year in Venice. One of the musicians from the Dresden Court, Johann Georg Pisendel had accompanied the crown prince on his travels, and he became good friends with Vivaldi and Albinoni. Pisendel did make copies of Albinoni’s Op. VII and brought the music to Dresden. We might rightfully assume that the oboist of the Dresden Hofkapelle, Johann Christinan Richter took a close interest in these oboe concertos, and “Bach could certainly have come in contact with certain Albinoni concertos during his stay in Dresden.”


Albinoni's Concertos Op. VII

Albinoni’s Concertos Op. VII

We don’t know if Bach made copies of the works he encountered in Dresden, but we do know that he made a trip to Berlin 1719. He was on a mission to take delivery of a new harpsichord for court at Cöthen, and he spent much time and money buying the latest chamber works in circulation. “Albinoni’s Opus VII concertos may well have been among many acquisitions of printed music. There is no concrete source evidence, but it seems unlikely that Bach came in contact with the Albinoni collection much before the fall of 1717, given the collection’s relatively recent publication date and the rate of transmission of Amsterdam prints to Central Europe.”

The mature concertos of Albinoni “were an important factor in Bach’s approach to the genre throughout the decade of the 1720s. Albinoni was certainly not the only influence on Bach’s concertos from this period, but he must be counted among the chief influences. His extended opening ritornellos, his use of formal and structural elements derived from an Italianate vocal style of writing for the soloist seems to have greatly appealed to Bach.”

J.S. Bach: Fugue in C major, BWV 946

J.S. Bach: Fugue in C major, BWV 946


J.S. Bach: Fugue in A major, BWV 950

J.S. Bach: Fugue in A major, BWV 950

While the close connection between Albinoni’s Op. VII and Bach’s Brandenburg’s rely on careful stylistic, formal and harmonic analysis, an immediate connection is found in four keyboard fugues with subjects taken from Albinoni’s Op. 1. In BWV 946, 950, 951, 951a we find Bach mastering a new style and maturing as a composer. While some scholars find “facile note-spinning and pointless harmonic meandering among other weaknesses,” others “give Bach credit for tackling rhythmically difficult subjects in a variety of two-, three-, and four-part textures during his teenage years.” In BWV 950, Bach quotes directly from the Albinoni original at two points beyond the subject itself. However, Bach does not merely quote the passages but expands and transforms them to become pillars of the formal structure. A critic writes, “Bach’s scholarly engagement with Albinoni taught him to bring the fugue to a convincing conclusion without a thematically irrelevant coda.”

Musicians and Artists: Stravinsky and Matisse

  

The Nightingale Collaboration

Even though they were contemporaries, Igor Stravinsky (1882–1971) and Henri Matisse (1869–1954) are rarely regarded together. In 1925, however, the two collaborated on a project for the Ballets Russes on a ballet version of Stravinsky’s first opera, The Nightingale, which was given its premiere in Paris on 26 May 1914. The discrepancy between the first act, written in 1908 and still very much by a student of Rimsky-Korsakov, and the second and third acts, written in 1913 and 1914, was a problem.

Pablo Picasso: Igor Stravinsky, 1920 (Paris: Picasso Museum)

Pablo Picasso: Igor Stravinsky, 1920 (Paris: Picasso Museum)

Sabine Devieilhe as The Nightingale, 2023 (Paris: Théâtre des Champs-Elysées)

Sabine Devieilhe as The Nightingale, 2023 (Paris: Théâtre des Champs-Elysées)

The story comes from Hans Christian Andersen, where a Chinese Emperor is given a live nightingale, which has a song so sweet that hearers weep with its beauty. Emissaries from Japan give the Emperor a mechanical nightingale that delights him. The real nightingale returns to the forest, insulted. Death comes for the Emperor, and the nightingale returns and charms Death. In return for singing for Death, he must return to the Emperor his crown, sword, and standard. Death agrees, and the Emperor comes back to life. The Emperor discards his mechanical bird, and the live bird agrees to sing nightly for the Emperor.

The poème symphonique called Chant du Rossignol also dates from 1914 as a way for Stravinsky to respond to some of Diaghilev’s criticism of the opera. Stravinsky dumped the 1908 first act material and only used the music from Acts II and III for a piece in four movements.

Without the context of opera, the Chinese elements in the work, including pentatonic scales and other exoticisms, would be difficult for the audience to understand. When the poème symphonique received its premiere on 6 December 1919, with Ernst Ansermet leading the Orchestre de la Suisse Romande. It was heavily criticised for its dissonance.

Still attempting to rescue the work, Stravinsky turned it into a ballet, written in the early months of 1917 but not staged until after WWI.

The ballet received its premiere on 2 February 1920 with choreography by Leonid Massine and designed by Henri Matisse.

Henri Matisse (seated) and Léonide Massine shown with the mechanical nightingale, 1920

Henri Matisse (seated) and Léonide Massine shown with the mechanical nightingale, 1920

Matisse’s drawings for the production put the Chinese elements to the fore.

Matisse: Costumes for the dancers

Matisse: Costumes for the dancers

Matisse: Costumes for the dancers and the Emperor (Gallica: btv1b7002923m)

Matisse: Costumes for the dancers and the Emperor (Gallica: btv1b7002923m)

Warrior’s costume (Gallica: btv1b7002916g)

Warrior’s costume (Gallica: btv1b7002916g)

Serge Leonovich Grigoriev (1883–1968) was the regisseur of the Ballets Russes from 1909 through the 1920s, and then, after the disbanding of the company with Diaghilev’s death in 1929, joined Colonel de Basil’s Ballet Russe in 1932, remaining with that company until 1948. The position of regisseur is critical to any company – functions as not only the director and the stage manager but also the choreographic reference point, and company memory. His phenomenal memory is what made Diaghilev’s ballets live on through the decades.

The Library of Congress holds Serge Leonovich Grigoriev’s photo album with examples of sets and costumes for Pulcinella, Les Femmes de Bonne Humeur, Petrouchka, Zéphire et Flore, Mavra, Le Renard, Les Biches, Les Fâcheux, and Barabau and photographs of Pulcinella, Le Chant du Rossignol, and Les Matelots.

Although they are in black and white, we can get a feeling for Matisse’s designs. Dancing the role of the Nightingale was Tamara Platonovna Karsavina, one of the leading ballerinas in the Russian Imperial Ballet, who was frequently invited to dance with Diaghilev’s company. Her most famous role was that of The Firebird in Stravinsky’s ballet for Diaghilev.

Image 7 (Library of Congress, Serge Grigoriev's photo album/scrapbook, https://hdl.loc.gov/loc.music/ihas.200156317)

Image 7 (Library of Congress, Serge Grigoriev’s photo album/scrapbook, https://hdl.loc.gov/loc.music/ihas.200156317)

Image 8 (Library of Congress, Serge Grigoriev's photo album/scrapbook, https://hdl.loc.gov/loc.music/ihas.200156317)

Image 8 (Library of Congress, Serge Grigoriev’s photo album/scrapbook, https://hdl.loc.gov/loc.music/ihas.200156317)

Image 9 (Library of Congress, Serge Grigoriev's photo album/scrapbook, https://hdl.loc.gov/loc.music/ihas.200156317)

Image 9 (Library of Congress, Serge Grigoriev’s photo album/scrapbook, https://hdl.loc.gov/loc.music/ihas.200156317)

Image 10 with Tamara Karsavina as The Nightingale (Library of Congress, Serge Grigoriev's photo album/scrapbook, https://hdl.loc.gov/loc.music/ihas.200156317)

Image 10 with Tamara Karsavina as The Nightingale (Library of Congress, Serge Grigoriev’s photo album/scrapbook, https://hdl.loc.gov/loc.music/ihas.200156317)


Image 11 with Tamara Karsavina (Library of Congress, Serge Grigoriev's photo album/scrapbook, https://hdl.loc.gov/loc.music/ihas.200156317)

Image 11 with Tamara Karsavina (Library of Congress, Serge Grigoriev’s photo album/scrapbook, https://hdl.loc.gov/loc.music/ihas.200156317)

Image 12 (Library of Congress, Serge Grigoriev's photo album/scrapbook, https://hdl.loc.gov/loc.music/ihas.200156317)

Image 12 (Library of Congress, Serge Grigoriev’s photo album/scrapbook, https://hdl.loc.gov/loc.music/ihas.200156317)

There is one photograph of the stage with Matisse’s decorations and costumes.

Henri Manuel: Photograph of the stage, designs by Matisse, 1920 (Gallica: tv1b7002909b)

Henri Manuel: Photograph of the stage, designs by Matisse, 1920 (Gallica: btv1b7002909b)

The dilemma for Stravinsky was that he thought the music was best heard in the concert hall, where it receives a focused hearing, rather than on the ballet stage, where the dancers also compete for attention.

Arvo Pärt

  

Weaving Silence and Spirituality

Arvo Pärt, born on 11 September 1935 in Paide, Estonia, is one of the most influential composers of contemporary classical music. Renowned for his distinctive tintinnabuli style, his music resonates with a profound simplicity that transcends cultural and temporal boundaries.

Arvo Pärt

Arvo Pärt

Pärt has crafted a sonic universe that appears to speak to the human soul, blending spiritual depth with structural clarity. On the occasion of his 90th birthday, let us take a closer look at his life and music, both deeply intertwined with spiritual exploration, political upheaval, and an unwavering commitment to a minimalist yet profound musical language.   

Arvo Pärt: Spiegel im Spiegel

Early Life and Career (1935-1971)

Arvo Pärt’s musical journey began in the small town of Rakvere, Estonia, where he moved with his mother after his parents separated. Early experiments with a damaged family piano sparked a lifelong fascination with sound. He began formal studies at the Rakvere Music School in 1945 and graduated from Secondary School in 1954.

That same year, he enrolled at the Tallinn Music School, though his studies were interrupted by military service in the Soviet army from 1954 to 1956. After being discharged due to health issues, he resumed his studies and eventually continued at the Tallinn Conservatory studying composition under Heino Eller.

During this period, Pärt also worked as a sound engineer at Estonian Radio, which exposed him to a wide array of music. His early compositional output was marked by experimentation and innovation, often incorporating techniques that were unprecedented among Estonian composers.

The pivotal work of this early phase was Credo of 1968. It was a controversial piece that fused quotation of Bach’s Prelude in C major with avant-garde techniques, tone clusters, and religious texts. This work marked both a culmination and a turning point, leading Pärt into a period of introspective silence and artistic re-evaluation.  

A Turn to Spirituality (1971-1980)

Following Credo, Pärt experienced a crisis of artistic identity. He distanced himself from modernist compositional techniques and began studying medieval and Renaissance sacred music, particularly Gregorian chant, the Notre Dame school, and early polyphony.

After conversion to the Orthodox Church in 1972, Pärt’s religious belief became a cornerstone of his music. Pärt had composed very little between 1968 and 1976, but he emerged from this silence with a radically new voice.

The young Arvo Pärt

The young Arvo Pärt

The tintinnabuli style, a term derived from the Latin for “little bells,” is characterised by a two-voice structure. A melodic voice moves diatonically around a central pitch, and a tintinnabuli voice outlines the tonic triad. This creates a hypnotic, bell-like resonance grounded in simplicity and spiritual reflection.

Pärt described tintinnabulation as “an area I sometimes wander into when I am searching for answers in my life, my music, my work. In my dark hours, I have a certain feeling that everything outside this one thing has no meaning.”  

Refining Tintinnabuli and Emigration

As Pärt matured, tintinnabuli evolved, and he began to incorporate more intricate variations into his music. In large-scale settings, Pärt assigned distinct key areas to characters, used punctuation-based rhythms, and aligned musical phrasing with the biblical narrative. This reflected his philosophical approach to music as a sacred, meditative act rooted in what he called an “economy of expression.”

Violinist Gidon Kremer describes it as “a cleansing of all the noise that surrounds us.” Pärt distinguished this reductionism from mere simplification, suggesting a spiritual discipline underlying the music. According to Pärt, the melodic voice represents the flawed, earthly world, while the tintinnabula voice offers stability and redemption.

In the late 1970s, Pärt faced increased censorship in Soviet Estonia. He emigrated to Vienna with his wife and sons in 1980, and a year later moved to West Berlin. Berlin became a creative hub for Pärt, as he forged crucial professional relationships.  

Arvo Pärt: Berliner Messe

Later Works and Legacy (2010-Present)

The ECM New Series recording Arbos (1987) introduced Pärt to a broader international audience. By the late 1990s, his music had reached iconic status in the classical world and beyond. In his later years, Pärt allowed greater freedom in his compositional process, and he began drawing inspiration from sculpture and architecture.

He received high-profile commissions, including Adam’s Lament (2010), based on the mystical writings of St. Silouan the Athonite. This work was staged by director Robert Wilson and earned a Grammy Award for its ECM recording in 2014.

The young Arvo Pärt

The young Arvo Pärt

Though Pärt avoids overt political messaging, he has made subtle yet profound ethical statements. Even though he no longer composes for film, his music appears widely in cinema and television. Fratres and Cantus in Memory of Benjamin Britten have featured in There Will Be BloodAvengers: Age of UltronFahrenheit 9/11, and The Young Pope, further increasing his global profile.

Pärt has received 13 honorary doctorates, multiple Grammy Awards, Classic Brit Awards, and countless international prizes. In 2010, Pärt and his family founded the Arvo Pärt Centre in Laulasmaa, Estonia. Originally envisioned as an archive, it expanded into a cultural centre featuring a concert hall and Russian Orthodox chapel.  

Arvo Pärt: Symphony No. 4 “Los Angeles”

Controversies

While Pärt’s music enjoys widespread popularity, it has not escaped criticism. Some detractors label it “naive and repetitive” or “sentimental holy minimalism,” arguing its simplicity lacks the complexity of modernist works.

However, as composer Steve Reich has observed, “Pärt is completely out of step with the zeitgeist and yet he’s enormously popular, which is so inspiring.” And others have asserted that the power of tintinnabulation lies in its “ascetic rigour and apparent simplicity,” which belies a sophisticated interplay of structure and emotion.

Recent scholarly attention, as seen in works like Arvo Pärt: Sounding the Sacred (2021), probes the “historical, spiritual, and sensory aspects” of Pärt’s sound, demystifying its emotional weight through material analysis. The 2005 publication Arvo Pärt in the Mirror, compiled by Enzo Restagno, and the 2010 conference “The Cultural Roots of Arvo Pärt’s Music” reflect growing academic interest in his technical and philosophical contributions.

Conductor Tõnu Kaljuste, a longtime collaborator, has praised the “dramatic directness” of Pärt’s later compositions, which blend piety with exhilaration. Pärt’s music, with its emphasis on silence and simplicity, offers a counterpoint to the chaos of modern life. As he stated, “How can one fill the time with notes worthy of the preceding silence?” This question encapsulates his aesthetic, where silence is “like fertile soil, awaiting our creative acts.”   

Conclusion

Arvo Pärt

Arvo Pärt

For Arvo Pärt, music is a dialogue with the divine, a rejection of nationalistic inspirations for universal spiritual ones. His legacy lies in his ability to distil complex emotions into simple, resonant sounds, creating music that speaks to both the sacred and the secular.

His tintinnabuli style, born from personal and artistic crisis, has redefined contemporary classical music, offering a sanctuary of stillness in a very noisy world. Through his unwavering commitment to purity and spirituality, Pärt has crafted a body of work that not only endures but continues to transform listeners, inviting them to find meaning in the silence between the notes.

Pärt never pandered to popular taste, but it is the result of a philosophy towards music and life. As the composer summarises, “Time and timelessness are connected. They represent the instant and eternity struggling within us.” For many, it fulfils a deep human need that has nothing to do with fashion.

Arvo Pärt’s artistic journey is one of profound personal transformation, musical innovation, and spiritual searching. From avant-garde beginnings to sacred minimalism, from political exile to global acclaim.

The Seven Most Popular Piano Concertos on YouTube

From Rachmaninoff (lots and lots of Rachmaninoff…) to Mozart to Chopin, here are the seven most viewed piano concerto performances on YouTube, along with our commentary about each, in reverse countdown order.

And not to sound like a YouTube title cliche, but the most popular one might surprise you!

a close up of hands playing piano

7. Frédéric Chopin: Piano Concerto No. 1 by Olga Scheps

Olga Scheps is a German pianist born in 1984, who is especially passionate about the works of Chopin.

This performance of his first piano concerto was recorded in 2014 with the Chamber Orchestra of Polish Radio.

Scheps brings an elegant, lyrical touch to this repertoire. Every phrase conjures some new gradation of emotion. She concentrates hard while still being clearly delighted by the music she’s playing, and that combination is irresistible.

The performance’s intimate atmosphere is enhanced by the smaller chamber orchestra.

6. Sergei Rachmaninoff: Piano Concerto No. 3 by Yunchan Lim 

Yunchan Lim’s winning performance from the 2022 Van Cliburn Competition made him a classical music superstar overnight…and this performance is a major reason why. Even videos just commenting on this video have millions of views!

Rachmaninoff’s Third Concerto is notorious for its countless demands, both technical and emotional, but Lim vanquishes all of them with an ease that verges on preternatural.

His poise, control, and intensity are jaw-dropping. (Did we mention he’s only eighteen in this video?)

This performance is a must-listen for any modern piano lover.

The performance went so viral that the Van Cliburn Competition actually posted a second version featuring remastered audio. That one has 4.9 million views of its own. If you combine the two, it would place number four on this list.

5. Frédéric Chopin: Piano Concerto No. 1

Here’s another competition-winning video that went viral: a performance of Chopin’s first piano concerto by Seong-Jin Cho, who won the 2015 Chopin International Piano Competition.

Cho’s interpretation is refined and heartfelt, with a natural elegance that makes even difficult passages seem effortless.

It’s sheer joy to watch him finish the concerto; he looks like he’s in his own little world of musicmaking, and we’ve been lucky enough to get to spy on it.

4. Sergei Rachmaninoff: Piano Concerto No. 2 by Nobuyuki Tsujii  

The musicality of blind pianist Nobuyuki Tsujii touches audiences deeply.

He learns music by ear, which enables him to learn (and hear) this music in a different way from other performers.

His technical mastery is remarkable, as is his heartbreaking sincerity.

The YouTube heatmap reveals that the most popular part of the performance is the ebullient ending from 30:45 on, where all of the sad loneliness of the first two movements turns into hard-won triumph. It’s mysterious and moving.

3. Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart: Piano Concerto No. 21 by Yeol Eum Son  

This performance is from the final round of the 2011 Tchaikovsky Competition, where pianist Yeol Eum Son would go on to win the silver medal.

It’s a lovely performance. Her touch throughout is beautifully measured. Every phrase has something to say, and serves a purpose within the longer musical line.

The concerto’s most famous part is its slow movement, which begins at 15:05. It was used in the movie Elvira Madigan, which has become the concerto’s nickname.

2. Sergei Rachmaninoff: Piano Concerto No. 2 by Anna Fedorova  

Anna Fedorova’s rendition of Rachmaninoff’s second piano concerto is the kind of performance that hits a listener squarely in the center of the chest: full-blooded and deeply personal.

Filmed at the Royal Concertgebouw in Amsterdam, this video is shot in a way that emphasises the architecture of the hall, as well as the way that the hall’s audience is wrapped tightly around the musicians. It lends a sense of intimacy to both the music-making and the cinematography.

Fedorova’s ability to balance power and restraint makes the concerto especially moving. Listen at 4:20 to how she treats the dreamy ascending and descending passages, then immediately follows those up with a quicksilver fleetness.

1. Cat Concerto from Tom and Jerry by Yannie Tan

66 million views   

Here’s the most-viewed piano concerto video on YouTube. Turns out it’s not actually a piano concerto at all: it’s a version of Liszt’s Hungarian Rhapsody No. 2, as arranged for the cartoon Tom and Jerry, performed by pianist Yannie Tan.

It’s cute, fun, and completely unexpected. The result is pure piano joy…complete with a cat ear costume.

Conclusion

From Rachmaninoff’s second concerto to Rachmaninoff’s third concerto, from Chopin to Chopin, and from Mozart to a concerto for a cat, all seven of these performances prove how compelling piano concerto videos can be to online audiences.

Which one of these seven is your favourite? And which pianist do you think will be the first to break 100 million views?