Popular Posts

Monday, November 25, 2024

Regine Velasquez - You've Made Me Stronger



FSO - West Side Story - Suite (Leonard Bernstein)



Friday, November 22, 2024

Celtic Woman 'O Come All Ye Faithful'


Composers of the Zodiac: Tropic of Scorpio

By Georg Predota, Interlude

constellation of Scorpio

Constellation of Scorpio

The constellation of Scorpio is associated with a number of myths. In one version rooted in Greek mythology, the legendary hunter Orion boasted to the goddess Artemis that he would kill every animal on Earth. Insulted by Orion’s excessive pride, Artemis sent a scorpion to kill Orion. Their heroic battle caught the attention of Zeus, who raised both combatants to the sky to serve as a stern reminder for mortals.

"Scorpio", plate 23 in Urania's Mirror, a set of celestial cards accompanied by A familiar treatise on astronomy ... by Jehoshaphat Aspin. London. Astronomical chart, 1 print on layered paper board : etching, hand-colored.

“Scorpio”, plate 23 in Urania’s Mirror
by Jehoshaphat Aspin

To this day, when Scorpio rules the night sky—from about October 23 to November 21—Orion goes away. It has been said the Scorpio is one of the most misunderstood signs of the zodiac. Because of its incredible passion and power, Scorpio is often mistaken for a fire sign. In fact, Scorpio is a water sign that derives its strength from the psychic and emotional realm. Extremely clairvoyant and intuitive, individuals born under the sign of Scorpio are imaginative and intense. They are ruled by Pluto (god of the Underworld) and Mars (god of War), and always know what they want and how to get it. Composer and pianist Roderick Elms, who for many years was the London pianist to cellist Mstislav Rostropovich as well as organist to the London Symphony Orchestra, provides his musical take on this powerful astrological sign.

Georges Bizet

Georges Bizet

Georges Bizet

Born on 25 October, Georges Bizet was a brilliant student at the Conservatoire de Paris, winning a great number of prizes including the prestigious Prix de Rome in 1857. Once he had returned to Paris after almost 3 years in Italy, he quickly found out that his music was not in demand. In the true spirit of a Scorpio, Bizet was nevertheless determined to orchestrate a career in music. His intentions weren’t necessarily nefarious, he simply knew what he wanted and wasn’t afraid to work hard to realize his ambitions. He was greatly optimistic about the premiere performance of his opera Carmen on 3 March 1875. In the event, it turned into a veritable disaster. The opera was on the verge of being withdrawn, and it has been suggested that the theater had to give away free tickets in order to boost attendance. Bizet, unfortunately died a mere three months after the premiere, and it is suspected that the negative reception contributed to his fatal heart attack. As a biographer wrote, “The spectacle of great works unwritten either because Bizet had other distractions… or because of his premature death, is infinitely dispiriting, yet the brilliance and the individuality of his best music is unmistakable.” 

Aaron Copland

Aaron Copland

Aaron Copland

Born on 14 November, Aaron Copland had a gift for natural leadership, and a great talent for management in all walks of life. On the outside, he displayed a deep calm while his true feelings were hidden deep within. Sensitive to the feelings of others, he displayed the greatest tact in all social interactions. Copland had a thorough understanding of the material world, and he clearly knew that his power and influence must be used for the benefit of mankind. And like a true Scorpio, he had the ability to inspire people and direct them to become part of his vision. Copland was a meticulous and hard worker, but he was easy going in almost all social situations. Realism was part of his nature as he dressed simply, yet he remained mysterious and sensitive. Copland easily bounced back from professional and personal failures, and true to his zodiac, he was wisely assertive throughout his life and in his music. 

Johann Strauss II

Johann Strauss II

Johann Strauss II

Seductive and beguiling, Scorpio is the sign most closely associated with sex. Sex isn’t solely about pleasure for the sensual scorpions, as they also crave the physical closeness, spiritual illumination, and the emotional intimacy that sex can provide. Well, Johann Strauss II, born on 25 October, certainly wasn’t shy when it came to sexual adventures. Like any good son, he initially tried to outdo his father in all aspect of life, particularly in music and sexual promiscuity. He mesmerized Viennese audiences, and in a blatant repeat of history, Vienna’s female population would swoon at the mere mention of his name. His popularity with the ladies got him into serious trouble, as on more than one occasion, jealous husbands challenged him to duels, and once he even had to seek refuge in the Austrian Embassy, barely escaping a double-barrel shotgun gently inviting him to marry a young Russian maid. When a planned marriage did not materialize, Strauss bedded dozens of eager groupies. Strauss II eventually did marry the mistress to a high-profile banker, but following her death, he frequented the local bordellos and after seven weeks he was married again. Be that as it may, music and sex definitely ruled the life of this Scorpio.

Niccolò Paganini

Niccolò Paganini

Niccolò Paganini

Born in Genoa on 27 October, Niccolò Paganini left an irrefutable mark on the history of instrumental music and 19th century social life. He was a born leader with extra-ordinary drive and determination. Once he made up his mind to study the violin and discover new and hitherto unsuspected effects that would astound people, nothing would stand in his way. He became obsessed with fame and money, and his relentless ambition translated into increasingly bizarre behavior. Supposedly, he was once invited to play at a funeral, but interrupted the ceremony with a twenty-minute solo concerto. And I am sure you’ve heard the story of him spending eight days in jail for drugging his girlfriend and forcing the abortion of his child. There was even a rumor that he had murdered a woman, used her intestines as violin strings and imprisoned her soul within the instrument. Women’s screams were supposedly heard from his violin when he performed on stage. Always concerned about appearances and to project success and self-satisfaction, this Scorpio demanded unconditional respect and attention.

Frank Martin (1890-1974): A Spiritual Tribute

By Georg Predota, Interlude 

The young Frank Martin

The young Frank Martin

Martin frequently wrote and lectured about his own work and about music in general. His beliefs are beautifully captured in a statement from 1966. “Whatever the movements of the soul, the spirit, the sensibility that are manifested in one’s work, and whether the state is one of anguish or even despair, one’s art inevitably bears the sign of … this liberation, this sublimation which evokes in us a finished form, and which is, I think, what is called beauty.”

Frank Martin was the tenth and youngest son of a Huguenot pastor, and he would later say of himself. “As a son of a minister, and as the son of a minister who has not renounced his faith, religion has affected me twice as strongly.” Spirituality was a continual source of inspiration, and on the 50th anniversary of his death, let us commemorate his lifelong devotion to sacred music. 

The “Mass for double Choir” dates from 1922, however, it was premiered only in 1963. Martin never intended this work to be performed publicly, as he “was afraid that it would be judged on a purely aesthetic level… it was a matter between God and myself.” Personal modesty aside, Michel Khalifa writes, “for a long time, Martin had been unable to fathom his own religious feelings. He had first to come to terms in his own way with the faith he had been brought up with.”

Frank Martin's Mass for double choir - Credo

Frank Martin’s Mass for double choir – Credo

The same might be said for Martin’s musical language. Since the Mass was not destined for public ears, Martin was free to experiment stylistically. Initially, it almost sounds like a homage to the vocal polyphony of the Renaissance, with free-flowing and metrically liberated vocal lines, a meticulous setting of the text, and a prevailing polyphonic texture. While we hear the influences of Gregorian chant and J.S. Bach, the harmonic language unmistakably originated in the 20th century.

Decades later, Martin found some shortcomings in his work. “Even though I wrote the mass for a large number of voices, it is music of an inward nature. My musical language has developed considerably since that period. There are some things in this work that I would no longer be able to write; there are also weaknesses that I would never repeat… Let us hope that conviction, youth and some beauty can still be appreciated in this mass that is almost half a century old.”

Golgotha

Frank Martin's Golgotha - Andante music score

Frank Martin’s Golgotha – Andante


Martin continued to compose smaller religious works, but he made his breakthrough with several well-received instrumental works and concertos. Only in the spring of 1945 did he once again turn to spiritual matters. As the composer relates, “I admired a marvellous collection of etchings by Rembrandt at an exhibition in our Museum of Fine Arts. Amongst so many masterpieces, I was particularly impressed by three prints, three states, each very different, of a vision of Calvary, usually entitled The Three Crosses.”

“Against a dark background of humans, who seem to be frozen in shock, the three crosses rise up; a sheet of white light descends from heaven onto the central cross, bearing Jesus in agony.” Martin later commented, “on this small surface of paper, we see the moment in world history where the fundamental incompatibility that exists between our material world and the world of the spirit was most dazzlingly manifested.”

For his oratorio Golgotha, Martin fashioned a text from the Passion narratives of all four gospels, concentrating all the light on the person of Christ while leaving the other protagonists in the shadows. In the manner of J.S. Bach, Martin intersperses the narrative with poetic reflections taken from St. Augustin’s Confessions and Mediations. In his music, Martin focused on finding the “right expression for each scene and each sentiment.”

Much of the music has the luminous transparency of a stained-glass window. As he relates, “I was not afraid to write certain passages in a very simple musical language, and others in a much more complex and tormented language… Let me assure you that no difficulties were included in this score unless I found it essential for the musical expression of the text.” The work, an act of faith and devotion, premiered in Geneva in April 1948.

Maria-Triptychon

Frank Martin

Frank Martin


The Maria-Triptychon originated as a “Magnificat” for soprano, solo violin and orchestra at the request of the violinist Wolfgang Schneiderhan and his wife, the soprano Irmgard Seefried. Martin writes, “At first, it was performed in Lucerne, but it soon became clear to me that the “Magnificat” required a surrounding musical frame. I therefore added an “Ave Maria” and a “Stabat Mater” to form what might be called the two flanking panels to the central panel and gave it the title Maria-Triptychon.”

Eventually, Martin added a piano to the medium-sized orchestra, and the obbligato solo violin plays in an almost concertante fashion. We immediately enter a mystical world in the first measures of the “Ave Maria.” An annotator writes, “From the sound of the slowly soaring violin, doubled by harp harmonics and una corda piano, it is clear that Martin has found in these Marian texts a release from the angst which pervaded a good deal of his earlier music.”

Neo-classical rhythms and a sharper level of dissonance are immediately audible in the “Magnificat.” Martin creates a complex texture with both the violin and voice circling in and out. Changes in mood related to the text are also expressed in the music, and repetitions of words become a specific device to unify musical form. A harsh dissonant ostinato over a static pedal point serves as the foundation for the soprano to intone the short lines of the “Stabat Mater.” The music is unrelentingly intense and only achieves some kind of tranquillity on the final “Amen.”

Requiem

Frank Martin's Requiem

Frank Martin’s Requiem


Sacred works dominate the last years of Martin’s life. Most important among these late works is the Requiem, dating from 1971/72. He had wanted to write a Requiem for decades, but the final stimulus came only in January 1971. As Martin relates, “I went on a Mediterranean trip where I was able to contemplate all alone in Saint Marc’s Church in Venice, the Cathedral of Monreale in Palermo and the Greek temples of Paestum near Naples. These three monuments, which express the sentiments of the adoration so completely, awakened in me a desire to build in my turn, using my limited means, a temple devoted to the adoration.”

Martin scored the work for four soloists, choir, orchestra including cembalo, and organ. He reduced the contrapuntal aspects of the music in order to give priority to the liturgical text. A gentle pianissimo from the strings and organ initiates the “Introit,” and after the music intensifies, it returns to the quiet of the beginning. The “Kyrie” opens contrapuntally but concludes with a quiet “Lento” passage.

The expansive “Dies Irae” opens vigorously and is followed by a chamber-like “Andante.” The intimate duet of oboe and tenor allows the orchestra and choir to rejoin, and after an energetic outburst, the movement simply dissolves. Reduced forces are employed in the “Offertorium,” while the “Sanctus” terminates with a powerful brass fanfare. The organ and alto contemplate the words of the “Agnus Dei,” with the inserted “In Paradisum” establishing an ethereal mood. Musically, the “Lux Aeterna” returns us to the “Introitus”, with the music exuding “an air of optimism.”

Polyptyque

Polyptyque

Polyptyque

Martin’s religious and spiritual inspiration also informs his instrumental works. When he was asked by Yehudi Menuhin and Edmond de Stoutz to write a concerto for violin and string orchestra, Martin produced a set of six pictures of the Passion of Christ. He found his inspiration in Siena, when he saw “a polyptych by Duccio, a set of very small panels representing the various episodes of the Passion.”

Martin was looking to “transpose into music the emotions that these scenes aroused in me, and in Image des Rameaux, I visualised a noisy crowd pressing forward to see the Lord entering Jerusalem… In the Image de la Chambre, we see Christ addressing disciples, and the Image de Judas portrays a being full of anguish, tormented at heart…The Image de Gethsémané is the anguish of loneliness, an intense prayer, and the Image du Jugement shows the full horror of the crowd freed from all restraint… I felt that there was no other possible ending save an Image de la Glorification.”

Michael De Sapio suggests, “Amid the deluge of music written in the 20th century, Martin’s work stands out for its integrity, humanism, and striving for beauty within a framework of changing conceptions of harmony, melody, and rhythm.” Fifty years after his death, as Alain Corbellari has recently written in a dedicated article for Interlude, “Frank Martin is very much alive,” and his expansive oeuvre awaits further exploration and renewed interpretations.

Franz Schubert (1797-1828): A Piano Duet Tribute

by Georg Predota, Interlude

Franz Schubert

Franz Schubert

Throughout the 19th century, piano music for four hands played an important role in the home. Since larger ensembles could only be afforded by the upper classes and the aristocracy, salons everywhere sounded with music for four hands, be it arrangements of works written for larger ensembles, the operatic stage, or original compositions.

For Schubert, the four-hand set-up seemed ideally suited to his temperament as “it was a congenial form of music-making that was emblematic in Biedermeier culture as an activity of friendship and sociability.” These works were a staple in Schubertiade’s gatherings, and they ranked among his most successful publications during his lifetime. As we commemorate Schubert’s passing on 19 November at the age of 31, let us celebrate his genius by exploring some of his genial and charming original works for piano 4-hands.

Franz Schubert wrote to a friend, “Every night when I go to bed, I hope that I may never wake again, and every morning renews my grief.” Yet, it was music that gave him purpose. As he wrote, “I compose every morning, and when one piece is done, I begin another.” In May and June 1828, Schubert composed the Allegro in A Minor, D 947 and the Rondo in A Major, D 951, as a possible two-movement sonata.

The Rondo was published in December 1828, a month after his death, but the Allegro only appeared in print in 1840. Anton Diabelli added the heading “Lebensstürme” (The storms of life), presumably with an eye on prospective customers. This trite sobriquet does not prepare us for the depth of Schubert’s music, as harmonic and structural shifts create subtleties of light and shade. Schubert was the undisputed master of compressing emotional complexity, joy, sorrow, friendship, and solace into a simple change of key.

Turbulent minor chords prepare for an opening statement that emerges from within a deep silence. An introspective melody murmurs in the unsmiling minor key, but the serenity of the second theme, sounding a distant chorale, leaves all storms far behind. However, Schubert has led the music into a highly remote territory, with the harmonic ground shifting restlessly. Suddenly, the music breaks off mid-stream, and an unceremonious plunge takes us to the central development stage. And while the radiant chorale takes centre stage in the recapitulation, the movement ends in the stormy minor key. 

With the “Lebensstürme” Allegro and the “Grand Rondeau,” Schubert completely transcended the confines of the salon and, in the process, wrote highly original and wonderful music for piano duet. The Schubert biographer Christopher H. Gibbs writes, “Such innovations may explain why his attraction to the medium continued even after his energies shifted increasingly to large-scale instrumental works. Indeed, the audacious harmonic and structural adventures in his finest keyboard duets may have pointed the way to orchestral projects that he did not live to realise…The late piano duets exquisitely merge Schubert’s lyrical gifts with daring formal structures.”

Franz Liszt called Schubert “the most poetic musician who had ever lived,” and musicologist Alfred Einstein called the A-Major Rondo D. 951 “the apotheosis of all Schubert compositions for four hands.” The piece is modelled on the lyrical second movement of Beethoven’s Piano Sonata in E minor, Op. 90. It mirrors the tranquillity of mood, the layout, and the harmonic pattern.

The Rondo theme is quietly accompanied by running 16th notes and immediately sounds an octave higher. This theme appears in various keys and registers throughout, and it is interspersed with episodes and subsidiary themes derived from it. A slightly stormy section in C Major is quickly cast aside, and the Rondo theme returns in the cello register to conclude the movement in a warm and quiet manner.

Variations in B-flat Major, D. 968a

Caroline Esterhazy

Caroline Esterhazy


For Schubert and his friends, four-hand piano music was a natural part of convivial evenings. This repertoire was almost exclusively destined for the private amateur salon market, and the prospects for having such pieces published were higher than they were for solo piano music, specifically when it came to works of the ambitious scope Schubert wanted to write.

Presumably written in 1818 or 1824, Schubert’s Variations D. 968a for piano four hands is one of series of compositions written for the two daughters of Count Johann Karl Esterházy. Schubert was engaged as a music tutor to the two girls and spent two summers at the Count’s estate at Zseliz in Hungary. Schubert wrote to his friend Moritz von Schwind, “I have composed a big sonata and variations for four hands; the latter is enjoying great applause here, but since I don’t quite trust the taste of the Hungarians, I’ll let you and the Viennese decide about them.”

A curiously pompous introduction terminates in a short cadenza for the primo pianist, and it is followed by a simple theme of Schubertian charm. The variations get progressively more brilliant, with Schubert accelerating the rhythms and adding rapid figuration. The third variation is aptly marked “Brilliante,” and it is followed by the mock solemnity of a slower variation. The merry finale features folk-like elements, including a yodelling call. It has been called “one of Schubert’s most jovial and overtly entertaining pieces.”

Sonata for Piano 4-hands in C Major, D. 812 “Grand Duo”

The big sonata Schubert mentioned to Moritz von Schwind turned out to be one of the most monumental and powerful achievements of the composer. Generally known as the “Grand Duo,” the work caused a bit of confusion. As Robert Schumann wrote in 1838, “I thought at first it was a symphony transcribed for piano, but the original manuscript on which Schubert has written Sonata for four hands would suggest I was wrong.”

Schumann continues, “I say I would suggest, for I am still not convinced of my error. A composer as prolific as Schubert may well, in haste, have written Sonata when what he really had in mind was a symphony. Knowing his style and his manner of writing for the piano and comparing this work with his other sonatas where the purest pianistic character is evident, I cannot but think that it was composed for the orchestra. You can hear the strings, the woodwind, the tutti, some solos, the drum roll; the symphonic form in all its breadth and depth.”

Joachim's orchestration of Schubert's Grand Duo

Joachim’s orchestration of Schubert’s Grand Duo

Joseph Joachim went ahead and orchestrated the “Grand Duo” in 1855, and the musicologist and composer Donald Francis Tovey included this orchestration in his book analysing symphonies. He wrote, “there is not a trace of piano style in the work.” More recently, the Sonata has been more readily appreciated as a piano work with orchestral effects, one of many other piano works by Schubert that have been called “symphonies in disguise.” 

Actually, Schubert wrote two sonatas for piano 4-hands. While the “Grand Duo” dates from 1824, the “Grande Sonata” originated in 1818. The two works couldn’t be more different, as the “Grande Sonata” seems very close to the world of Mozart, “the unique combination of purity, subtlety and emotional richness of whose music was an abiding source of wonder to Schubert.”

A grand opening gesture, a wonderful curtain-raiser, proceeds to an easy-going theme. The contrasting second subject sounds in a remote key, but it cheekily meanders back to the correct key just in time to close the exposition. Schubert also introduces a charming new melody in the middle of the development, which will be echoed in the beautiful slow movement. The Rondo finale takes a renewed look at Mozart with a dramatic, almost operatic middle section and replaces the development.

The work stems from Schubert’s time at the Esterházy’s estate at Zseliz in Hungary, and it found the composer in a jovial mood. He writes, “I am in the best of health. I live and compose like a god, as though indeed nothing else in the world were possible… I am really alive at last, thank God!”

Polonaises, D. 599

Schubert's Polonaise

Schubert’s Polonaise


Schubert published a couple of sets of Polonaises in 1826 and 1827. The young Robert Schumann, not yet seventeen, was already reviewing for a Frankfurt publication and wrote of “most original and very richly melodious little movements… The execution is difficult at times on account of the sometimes surprising and sometimes far-fetched modulations. Thoroughly recommended.”

Schumann called them “romantic rainbows over a sublimely slumbering universe,” as Schubert turned the Polish courtly ceremonial style of music into his own delightful and sparkling character pieces. The Polonaises for piano 4-hands range from light and airy to robust and balletic, but all unfold in three-part form and venture into unexpected keys.

Fugue in E minor of Piano 4-hands, D. 952

Schubert's Fugue in E minor

Schubert’s Fugue in E minor


In 1828, Schubert and his friend Franz Lachner were invited by Johann Schikh, the editor of a Viennese magazine for art, literature, theatre, and fashion, for a country outing to Baden, near Vienna. Apparently, Schikh told Schubert, “Tomorrow morning, we shall go to Heiligenkreuz to hear the famous organ there. Perhaps you could both compose a small piece and perform it there?” Schubert suggested the composition of a four-hand fugue, which was completed by midnight.As Lachner reports, “on the next day, at 6 in the morning, we travelled to Heiligenkreuz where the fugues were performed in the presence of several monks.” The fugue subject had already appeared in Schubert’s counterpoint lesson with Simon Sechter, and it might well have been his very last completed composition. As he wrote to a friend eight days later, “I am ill. I have had nothing to eat or drink for eleven days now and can only wander feebly and uncertainly between armchair and bed.”

Fantasie in F minor, D 940

Schubert composed a number of Fantasies, but the one in F minor, D 940, is surely one of the best-loved works in the piano duet literature. But what is more, it is widely considered one of Schubert’s greatest masterpieces. Dedicated to Countess Caroline Esterházy, this work completely leaves the sphere of informal social gatherings. During the first months of his last year of life, Schubert created a work of almost symphonic form, whose elegiac atmosphere at the beginning sets the tone for the entire work. Schubert scholar John Reed called it “a work which in its structural organisation, economy of form, and emotional depth represents Schubert’s art at its peak.”

Although Schubert called it a Fantasie and the work unfolds in one continuous flow of music, it might well be structured in the manner of a sonata in four movements. The opening “Allegretto molto moderato” evolves from a murmuring accompaniment that features a theme of halting rhythms and chirping grace notes. When Schubert almost hypnotically repeats the theme, the music has effortlessly shifted from F minor to F Major. The rhythmically conceived second subject drives directly into a powerful “Largo.” We move directly into the “Allegro vivace,” a sparkling scherzo of nostalgia followed by a delicate trio. The trio breaks suddenly, and the music eventually plunges into a complex fugue, which takes us to the point of despair. The concluding section brings back the music from the very beginning, and contrapuntal complexity drives the Fantasie to its climax. It all ends with some heart-rendering chords that bring this masterwork to a quiet close.

A scholar writes, “that a legacy of such beauty should have been bequeathed to all humanity as a result of Schubert’s pain and suffering is a miracle in itself.” And Schubert himself commented in the final moments of his life, “the product of my genius and my misery, and that which I have written in my greatest distress, is that which the world seems to like best.”

Franz Schubert died in Vienna on November 19, 1828, and he was buried at his own request near Beethoven. Schubert had carried the torch at Beethoven’s funeral a year before his own death.