Antonio Vivaldi (Died on 28 July 1741) Seasons of Genius

 by Georg Predota  July 28th, 2025

Antonio Vivaldi (1678–1741), known as the “Red Priest” due to his fiery hair and brief priestly career, stands as one of the most influential composers of the Baroque era. The most original and influential Italian composer of his generation, Vivaldi laid the foundations for the mature Baroque concerto.

Antonio Vivaldi

Vivaldi’s life was marked by innovation, resilience, and a relentless pursuit of musical expression as he contributed to musical style, violin technique, the practice of orchestration, and to orchestral programme music. His vibrant compositions, entrepreneurial spirit, and complex personal life shaped a legacy that continues to resonate in concert halls worldwide.   Early Life and Venetian Roots

Antonio Vivaldi was born on 4 March 1678 in the city of Venice, a city pulsating with cultural and musical vitality. His father, a professional violinist, likely introduced him to the violin, fostering his early musical development. Antonio’s fragile health at birth, possibly due to bronchial asthma, necessitated an emergency baptism. As Michael Talbot writes, “Vivaldi’s asthma, while a hindrance, never curtailed his ambition or his ability to undertake arduous journeys.”

Venice was a hub of commerce and art, and the city’s vibrant musical culture included opera houses and churches. By 1696, Antonio was performing as a violinist at St. Mark’s, and his training for priesthood culminated in ordination in 1703.

However, Vivaldi’s health and growing musical commitments led him to abandon saying Mass by 1706, a decision he later attributed to his asthma. Karl Heller suggests, “Vivaldi’s withdrawal from priestly duties was likely pragmatic, allowing him to focus on music, though he maintained a veneer of piety.

The Ospedale della Pietà and Pedagogical Innovation

Vivaldi received his appointment at the Ospedale della Pietà, a Venetian institution for orphaned and abandoned girls, in 1703. This position, which he held intermittently until 1740, was pivotal in shaping his compositional output. The Ospedale was not merely a charitable institution but a renowned musical academy where girls received rigorous training, and Vivaldi’s duties included teaching, composing, and directing performances.

Ospeddale della Pietà

The Ospedale’s concerts attracted Venetian elites and foreign visitors, elevating Vivaldi’s reputation. As Jane L. Baldauf-Berdes observes, “The Ospedale provided Vivaldi with a unique laboratory for musical experimentation, allowing him to develop his distinctive concerto style.”

Vivaldi’s pedagogical approach was innovative, as it emphasised technical precision and expressive freedom, all tailored to the all-female ensemble. His teaching methods fostered a generation of skilled female musicians, and the environment allowed Vivaldi to experiment with instrumentation, incorporating unusual instruments into his concerto compositions.         The Concerto and The Four Seasons

Vivaldi’s most enduring contribution to music is his development of the Baroque concerto, particularly the solo concerto form. His L’estro armonico (Op. 3), a collection of twelve concertos, revolutionised the genre with its three-movement structure and dynamic interplay between soloist and ensemble. Published in Amsterdam, the collection gained international acclaim.

Of course, his Four Seasons, part of a different collection, is Vivaldi’s most iconic work. Each concerto, accompanied by descriptive sonnets, vividly depicts seasonal imagery through music techniques. A scholar writes, “The Four Seasons transcends mere program music, blending technical virtuosity with poetic narrative.”

Vivaldi’s plaque on Chiesa della Pieta

Vivaldi’s concertos, numbering over 500, demonstrate his versatility and prolific output. He composed for diverse instruments, from violin to bassoon, and his ritornello form, a recurring orchestral theme interspersed with solo episodes, became a hallmark of the Baroque concerto.

Susan McClary argues, “Vivaldi’s concertos embody the Baroque ideal of contrast and unity, creating a dialogue between individual expression and collective harmony.”   

Opera and Entrepreneurial Ventures

Beyond the composition of various concertos, Vivaldi was a prominent figure in Venetian opera, composing nearly 50 works and managing productions as an impresario. His operatic career began with Ottone in villa (1713) and included works like Orlando furioso (1727). Vivaldi collaborated with his father in navigating the competitive and financially risky world of opera production.

Reinhard Strohm notes, “Vivaldi’s operas, while less celebrated today, were central to his career, reflecting his ability to adapt to the tastes of Venetian audiences.” His entrepreneurial spirit also extended to publishing, with a number of collections showcasing his market savvy.

Vivaldi travelled to cities like Verona and Mantua, often accompanied by the singer Anna Girò, a rumoured romantic partner. His travels greatly expanded his influence but also sparked controversy, as he faced censure from the Church for conduct unbecoming of a priest. Be that as it may, Vivaldi’s defiance of ecclesiastical norms clearly reflected the priority of artistic freedom over clerical duty.

Antonio Vivaldi: Orlando furioso, “Sol da te, mio dolce amore”   Play

Later Years and Legacy

In 1740, seeking new opportunities, Vivaldi left Venice for Vienna, hoping to secure patronage from Emperor Charles VI. However, the emperor’s death shortly after Vivaldi’s arrival left him without support. Struggling financially, Vivaldi died in Vienna on 28 July 1741, and he was buried in a pauper’s grave.

In the immediate aftermath of his passing, Vivaldi’s music fell into relative obscurity, overshadowed by the emerging Classical style. His prolific output was largely neglected, with manuscripts scattered across Europe or lost. However, the early 19th century saw a gradual rediscovery, sparked by the Bach revival, as scholars noted Johann Sebastian Bach’s transcriptions of Vivaldi’s concertos, which highlighted their structural ingenuity and expressive vitality.

Bach’s transcription of Vivaldi (BWV 596)

By the late 19th and early 20th centuries, musicologists like Arnold Schering and performers like Fritz Kreisler began championing Vivaldi’s works, particularly his concertos, for their rhythmic energy and innovative use of solo instruments within the concerto grosso form. This resurgence culminated in the 20th-century “Vivaldi Renaissance,” driven by the rediscovery of manuscripts, such as those found in Turin in the 1920s.   

Vivaldi Today

Today, Vivaldi’s legacy is firmly entrenched in both academic study and popular culture, with The Four Seasons serving as a cornerstone of the Baroque repertoire and a cultural touchstone. His influence extends beyond classical music, inspiring adaptations in film, television, and even popular music, while his innovative approach to programmatic music continues to captivate audiences.

Modern scholarship, such as the work of Michael Talbot and Susan Orlando, emphasises Vivaldi’s role in shaping the concerto form and his impact on the development of virtuosic violin techniques. Institutions like the Istituto Italiano Antonio Vivaldi and ongoing cataloguing efforts, such as the Ryom-Verzeichnis, underscore his enduring significance, ensuring that his works remain accessible to performers and researchers.

Antonio Vivaldi’s genius lies in his ability to weave vibrant musical narratives that capture the exuberance of Baroque Venice while transcending time. His innovative concertos blend technical virtuosity with evocative imagery, transforming notes into vivid depictions of nature and human emotion. His relentless creativity and entrepreneurial spirit reshaped the musical landscape, influencing contemporaries like Bach and leaving a legacy that resonates in modern performances.

In the words of Michael Talbot, “Vivaldi’s genius was to make the ordinary extraordinary!” Despite personal challenges, including chronic illness and ecclesiastical scrutiny, Vivaldi’s fiery spirit burns brightly, ensuring his place as a timeless luminary in the pantheon of Western music.

Dmitri Hvorostovsky (Born on October 16, 1962) Singing with Death

 by Georg Predota  October 16th, 2026

The Russian baritone Dmitri Hvorostovsky was born in the industrial city of Krasnoyarsk, in Soviet-era Siberia, on 16 October 1962. He surprised the world by winning the Singer of the World Competition in Cardiff in 1989, and he stormed from success to success on the operatic stages of Europe and America.

His beautiful, cultivated voice was moderate in size but projected strongly, while his dramatic involvement grew steadily with experience. Always self-critical and highly empathic with the psychological dilemmas of his characters, Hvorostovsky announced in 2015 that he was suffering from a brain tumour. This illness took his life in 2017.

Hvorostovsky retained a strong musical and personal connection with Russia, performing as a celebrated recitalist in every corner of the globe. To celebrate his birthday, let’s turn to one of his most compelling Russian recordings, the Songs and Dances of Death by Modest Mussorgsky.

Dmitri Hvorostovsky (2011)

Dmitri Hvorostovsky sings Mussorgsky: Songs and Dances of Death, “Lullaby”  

In a 2014 interview about his Russian-song recording “From Russia with Love”, Hvorostovsky commented on a Borodin composition, calling it typically Russian and offering a wonderful variety of Russian lyricism.

He also spoke of his Siberian upbringing and Russian cultural environment in 2005, suggesting that he didn’t have to travel to Moscow or St. Petersburg to study music, as the cultural background in any part of the country is very rich and profound, including the town he grew up in.

Dmitri Hvorostovsky and Valery Gergiev

Modest Mussorgsky (1839–1881) had no academic training as a composer and worked as a civil servant. His Songs and Dances of Death set poems by his friend and relative Arseny Golenishchev-Kutuzov. Originally written for voice and piano, they are often performed in orchestrations by Dmitri Shostakovich or Kalevi Aho.

Many of Mussorgsky’s songs have a strong satirical undertone; however, the Songs and Dances of Death are strikingly different. They are described as dramatic and realistic scenes from real life, revolving around dying and death.  

“Lullaby” provides a vivid portrayal of a child’s gradual death, and the mother’s desperate struggle for her child. Death becomes a bridegroom in “Serenade,” and “Trepak” describes a drunken peasant who is overtaken by death in a snowstorm. In the “Field-Marshal,” death appears in the flesh amidst the tumult of war, eventually declaring victory.

Hvorostovsky recorded the cycle twice, first in January 1993 with the Kirov Orchestra and Valery Gergiev. Hvorostovsky was only 30, yet he places this deeply Russian repertoire at the centre of one of his early recordings.

This cycle does not need a singer with a beautiful lyric baritone, but an artist capable of dramatic declamation and wide tonal variety. This recording wasn’t an isolated Mussorgsky project, as it was surrounded by art-song selections from his Russian cultural heritage.

Dmitri Hvorostovsky, Lieder recital

Hvorostovsky returned to the Mussorgsky cycle again eleven years later. In 2004, he performed it at the BBC Proms and subsequently recorded it again for Warner. A contemporary BBC Music Magazine declared that Hvorostovsky’s interpretation had changed surprisingly little over the decade.

Mussorgsky has always been part of Hvorostovsky’s Russian musical fabric. Explaining why he included Songs and Dances of Death in a recital programme, he said that “death is an unavoidable factor for human, life is its opposition, and love. Life, love, and death are fundamental elements of art.” 

And he makes his Russian connection even more explicit when asked what Russian music meant to him. He stated, “This is what belongs to me. How can I describe what is part of my nature?” 

Dmitri Hvorostovsky

David Oistrakh (Born on September 30, 1908) Teaching the Musician

 by Georg Predota  September 30th, 2026

For many historians and critics, David Oistrakh was one of the preeminent violinists of the 20th century. To be sure, Oistrakh made playing the violin look easy, and many considered him the ideal violinist, combining fingers of steel with a heart of gold.

David Oistrakh, 1956

Isaac Stern considered him a giant among violinists, and his recordings continue to be studied and admired for their interpretive depth. Yet he was no aloof virtuoso; his legacy also includes his role as a teacher and mentor to countless young musicians.

To celebrate Oistrakh’s birthday on 30 September, let us look at Oistrakh the pedagogue as he shaped generations of violinists at the Moscow Conservatory, beginning in 1934.  

Teaching the Next Generation

David Oistrakh and Gidon Kremer

At the initiative of the pianist and pedagogue Alexander Goldenweiser, David Oistrakh was invited to teach at the Moscow Conservatory in 1934. At 25, he was already a highly accomplished violinist, but his international breakthrough was still three years away.

By 1939, after winning first prize at the Ysaÿe Competition in Brussels, Oistrakh was appointed professor, and in 1950 he became head of the violin department. Maintaining an active performing career, Oistrakh invited Yulia Brodskaya to assist him in teaching solo and chamber music, and Rosa Fain to assist him with solo students in the 1950s.

His period of employment lasted until 1974, essentially until his death from a heart attack. Oistrakh taught some of the most prominent violinists of the 20th century, including students from outside the Soviet Union, and the Moscow Conservatory still describes his pedagogy as a “fruitful union of intellect and intuition, precise knowledge and freedom of artistic creativity.”  

Teaching Individuality

Rimma Sushanskaya

In a 2015 interview with LA Opus, Gidon Kremer was asked directly what it was like to study with Oistrakh, to which he replied: “His main quality towards students was probably generosity; that was literally towards everybody, not so often seen among musicians and especially teachers. David Oistrakh encouraged me a lot to search (for) my own voice.” (Miner, LA Opus, 2015)

It becomes obvious that Oistrakh was not interested in producing “little Oistrakhs,” and that imitation was not his pedagogical ideal. He recognised early that Kremer was a highly individual musician, whose interpretive personality was unlike his own.

Essentially, Oistrakh did not impose a rigid technical teaching system because he wanted to develop the complete musician. In the wonderful Oistrakh documentary by Bruno Monsaingeon, Kremer remembers his teacher telling him, “I would never do what you are doing, but you are right, and you have to go your own way.”   

Discipline, Humour, and Humanity

Igor and David Oistrakh

For Gidon Kremer, Oistrakh was one of the greatest violinists of the century, and also a great teacher. He let each student develop in their own way, encouraging their unique talents.

This is not to say that Oistrakh did not have very definite ideas about playing the violin and passing on his knowledge. He was very demanding and firm, and rather than explaining an interpretive problem in words, he picked up the violin and demonstrated it.

His son Igor gave a first-hand account of his father’s teaching. “Father had many different students in his class, not just prize winners. Despite this, the atmosphere never changed. He never got tired of teaching. He was always alert and awake, as were his receptivity and friendly humour, which were occasionally coloured with a touch of friendly irony.” (Yuzefovich, Conversation with Igor Oistrakh, 1979)  

Beyond the Violin

Igor and David Oistrakh

In her Memories of David Oistrakh, his last student, Rimma Sushanskaya recalled that Oistrakh did not teach his students how to play the violin, but how to become better musicians and artists. He worked with her on bowing and fingering, but his greatest happiness was helping young musicians. (Sushanskaya, Memories of David Oistrakh)

As a final thought, Oistrakh would tell his students: “Try to know more. The limitations of one’s horizons, a narrowing of one’s interests lead to a decline, even of a strong talent. Avoid any way of restricting the repertoire.” (Yuzefovich, Conversation with Igor Oistrakh, 1979)

Javier Perianes (Born on September 24, 1978) When Silence Speaks

 by Georg Predota  September 24th, 2026

The Spanish pianist Javier Perianes was born on 24 September 1978 in Nerva. He graduated in piano studies from the Conservatorio Superior de Música in Seville and received additional guidance from Richard Goode, Alicia de Larrocha, and Daniel Barenboim.

Winning first prizes at the Concurso Internacional de Piano Premio Jaén and the Concurso de la Fundación Jacinto e Inocencio Guerrero launched his international career, and his Harmonia Mundi recordings have received critical acclaim.

To celebrate his birthday, let us take the opportunity to sample his recording of Música Callada by Catalan composer and pianist Federico Mompou.

Javier Perianes

In an interview published by Miami Clásica on 10 October 2011, originally in Spanish, Perianes was asked how he approached Mompou’s Música Callada. “It is music based on silence, which is the great accomplice of musicians.” Mompou took the term from a poem by St. John of the Cross, and it basically means “music that does not sound.”

“To approach it, you need inner silence and to be free of prejudices. It seems easy, static, but the concentration of emotion is devastating. The recording was made in one day, in a single sweep, which is how I believe it should be approached.”

Mompou is best known for his solo piano music, characterised by elegance, direct melody, and the deep, haunting emotions of folk music. The meditative qualities of his music seem to conjure ritual and ancient mystery.

A Weak Heartbeat

Federico Mompou, 1955

Música Callada, which roughly translates as “Music of Silence,” is a cycle of 28 short piano pieces organised in four books. Composed during the 1950s and 1960s, it was Mompou’s last work for solo piano, and the composer considered it a high point of his career.

A key to understanding this music is a poem by the Spanish-Christian mystic St John of the Cross (1542–1591), published in his Cántico Espiritual.

The quiet night,
before the break of dawn,
the music of silence,
the resounding solitude,
the meal that refreshes and awakens love.

De la Cruz provides commentary on the passage reading, “This is silent music, for it is quiet and still knowledge, without an audible voice; and thus, in it, one enjoys the sweetness of music and the tranquillity of silence. The soul says that the beloved is silent music.”

These thoughts are echoed by Mompou, who explained, “This music has neither air nor light. It is a weak heartbeat. One cannot ask it to travel more than a few millimetres through space, but it has the task of penetrating the deepest recesses of our soul and the most secret regions of our spirit.”

“This music is silent because it is heard inwardly. Restraint and reserve. Its emotion is secret and takes sonic form only in its resonances beneath the great cold vault of our solitude. I hope that my Música callada, this newborn child, will bring us closer to a new warmth of life and to the expression of the human heart, always the same and always renewing itself.” (Fundació Frederic Mompou)

Making Silence Audible

Javier Perianes, Música callada

In his 2006 recording, Javier Perianes approaches this music with extraordinary delicacy but without grand sentimentality. His performance has an emotional directness that suits the ephemeral character and lets the poetry emerge silently.

It almost sounds like Perianes is making silence itself perceptible, as if making listeners aware of the space from which the sounds emerge. The clarity of his playing uncovers the tension beneath the surface. As such, it has been suggested that Perianes evokes the music’s spiritual dimension with great consistency.

Under Perianes’ hands, Música callada becomes purely contemplative music, aiming to convey the point of indifference between the music and the listeners.

The Dactylion

by Georg Predota  June 20th, 2018

The opening decade of the 21st century is once more gripped by a passion for musical virtuosity. Countless young and aspiring musicians—frequently supported and driven by overzealous parents—are vying to study at the most prestigious conservatories and with the most esteemed teachers around the world. To the music historian, this kind of narcissistic frenzy is nothing new, as the rage for keyboard instruments at the beginning of the 19th century reached ever-new levels of insanity. Teacher invented a whole series of mechanical devices—more reasonably called torture devices—that could supposedly help a budding virtuoso achieve even greater finger agility. And Henri Herz patented one such contraption, called the Dactylion in 1836. Mind you, Herz was one of the most famous virtuosos and popular composers in Paris of the 1830s and 40s. He engaged in extended concerts tours to Russia, the United States and South America, and to supplement his income he kept an enormous stable of willing piano students.

The dactylion was specifically designed to loosen and strengthen the fingers of would-be virtuosos. It was made up of two parallel wooden bars. The first was fixed to the front of the keyboard and guided the hands. The second wooden bar, placed parallel to the first, had ten rings. These rings, one for each finger, were attached to springs that could be adjusted to give greater resistance. Apparently, the device just flew of the shelves!

A good number of musicians, however, were rather skeptical from the beginning. The pianist Friedrich Kalkbrenner introduced François-Joseph Fétis, the first director of the Brussels Royal Music Conservatory, to the Dactylion. “It seems,” Fétis remarked, “that the Dactylion is only good for catching mice.” No, replied Kalkbrenner, “Monsieur Henri Herz made it for catching fools.” Robert Schumann was highly critical of Herz’s compositions, claiming that this music “exemplified the hollow state of the Parisian virtuosos.” But we also know that Schumann developed rather severe hand problems in the mid 1830s. Nobody knows if he actually bought a Dactylion, but he certainly made a contraption, probably based on the Dactylion that isolated one finger at a time. All that venom and spite against the Parisian virtuosos might, after all, have been the result of having been made a fool!

François Couperin (Died on September 11, 1733) The Art of Touch

 by Georg Predota  September 11th, 2026

Over 300 years ago, in 1716, the great French harpsichordist François Couperin published his famous treatise L’Art de Toucher le Clavecin (The Art of Playing the Harpsichord). It is, by all accounts, the main Baroque text on playing the instrument, and its importance was acknowledged for decades both within and outside France.

François Couperin

Couperin died on 11 September 1733 at the age of sixty-four, and the early music expert Jordi Savall suggests that Couperin was the “poet musician par excellence” who believed in “the ability of Music to express itself in prose and poetry.”

To commemorate his passing, let’s have a look at his most famous book, which contains suggestions for fingering, touch, ornamentation, and various features of keyboard technique. It also contains eight preludes and an Allemande that demonstrate his ideas about keyboard playing. 

Teaching Good Taste

L’art de toucher le clavecin

Couperin’s reasons for writing his L’Art de toucher le Clavecin are detailed in the preface. “This instrument,” he writes, “has its own peculiarities, just as the violin has its own. If the harpsichord cannot swell its notes, if the rapid repetition of the same note does not particularly suit it, then it has other advantages: accuracy, clarity, brilliance, and its greater range.”

“Above all, one must develop a sensitive touch for the keys and always have a well-feathered instrument. However, I understand that there are people for whom this may be irrelevant, because they play equally badly on any instrument.”

Although Couperin presents his treatise as something new and unique, it belongs to a growing tradition of instrumental methods. As amateur music-making became an important part of fashionable French society, learning an instrument was considered essential to education and good taste.   

When Music Learns to Speak

As Couperin suggests in his preface, the most important aesthetic idea is the comparison between musical performance and rhetoric. Reading musical notation is not the same as performing music, as it does not tell us how the music should speak. As such, the author spends much time on phrasing, punctuation, articulation, and expression.

Couperin begins with the player’s physical position and hand position. He soon turns to matters of touch, stressing “la belle souplesse” (suppleness) and the soft, flexible hands required for harpsichord playing. The search for the most perfect touch was the holy grail of harpsichordists of his time.

Feathery touch aside, Couperin demonstrates how expressive possibilities can be created through means other than simple dynamic pressure. Essentially, the performer shapes music through a subtle hierarchy of gestures and the character of individual phrases.   

Grammar of Ornament

Couperin: The Art of Playing the Harpsichord

Couperin devotes considerable space to ornaments as part of the musical language. This includes the manner of fingering and execution, and his explanations demonstrate the close relationship between fingering and musical expression. The elegance of performance is inseparable from expression.

To demonstrate his didactic and theoretical ideas, Couperin included eight preludes and one Allemande. In his 1717 revision, Couperin explains why he composed the eight preludes himself. “I must not forget to explain, before finishing this little discourse, that the method entitled L’Art de toucher le clavecin, which I have just mentioned, contains, among other things, eight preludes suitable for all ages and for all kinds of hands.”

“The fingers with which they are to be played are marked there by numbers, and I have even composed these preludes expressly in all the keys of my pieces, both those of my first book and those with which this second is filled.”  

Beyond the Bar Line

François Couperin

The first prelude in C Major serves as an instruction, while No. 2 is particularly rich in ornamentation and expressive inflexion. No. 3 in G minor is darker and rhetorically charged, with No. 4 in F Major presenting a flowing and lyrical discourse. No. 5 in A Major is bright and expansive, while No. 8 becomes more concentrated.

These preludes belong to a tradition in which the music is written without conventional bar lines. As such, they accord the performer considerable freedom in determining the rhythmic flow. They are not to be taken as improvisations, but as music that is fundamentally free in form.

The inclusion of the Allemande allows Couperin to demonstrate how technique becomes musical expression. Every individual section of the treatise is now combined in a fundamental dance of the French keyboard suite. It contains everything Couperin has been discussing, and it also serves as a demonstration of the differences between French and Italian styles.

L’Art de Toucher is the most important Baroque text on playing the harpsichord, and Carl Philipp Emanuel Bach still acknowledged it in his treatise of 1753. At that time, 37 years had elapsed, and the musical world had undergone a radical change of taste and style.

An Italian: Tragedy Giuseppe Verdi and Margherita Barezzi

by Georg Predota  March 30th, 2013

Giuseppe Verdi

Giuseppe Verdi was a painfully private individual. Details about his romantic encounters are sketchy, and for the most part rely on his own and somewhat inconsistent recollections later in life. We do know, however, that Verdi went to live in the house of the grocer and wine merchant Antonio Barezzi in 1831. Barezzi was the president of the Philharmonic Society in Busseto, and many of its performances and rehearsals were held in a large room in his house. He was also the proud father of three daughters. The eldest, Margherita was only five months younger than Verdi and said to be pretty, gentle and fond of music. Encouraged by her father, Margherita took voice and piano lessons from the young maestro Verdi, and soon the romantic sparks started to fly. For over a year, the young lovers managed to keep their relationship a secret, but all that four-hand piano practice eventually aroused the suspicions of Margherita’s parents. Margherita was, after all, approaching marriageable age and the presence of a penniless musician might easily have compromised her reputation. Although Mummy and Daddy did not fundamentally object to the relationship, a solution had to be found nevertheless.

And so it came to pass that Daddy Barezzi financed Verdi’s first year of study in the far-away city of Milan. Promising to pay back the parental scholarship and to marry his “Ghita” once he had secured a job, Verdi sets off in July 1832. Besides providing an exciting musical and artistic environment, the big city also held attractions of a different nature. Verdi lodged with Professor Giuseppe Seletti and his absolutely stunning daughter Dorina. Seletti would complain bitterly to Barezzi about Verdi’s behavior. “You must understand that being a good musician does not make him an honest man. I found him rude, proud, and acting like a scoundrel in my house. I cannot tell you how much damage he has done to my family, because it is too indecent to write about.”

Margherita Barezzi

Once Verdi returned to Busetto in 1833, he took Dorina with him. It is hard to tell how Margherita reacted — Daddy Barezzi would have been suitably embarrassed — but the local clergy was outraged. When Verdi applied for the job as the town’s “maestro di musica,” a rival candidate was quickly nominated, leading to an extended and heated town quarrel, which included street brawls, arrests and prosecutions. The matter was finally settled in 1835 — by then Dorina had gracefully exited stage right — and Verdi received the official town contract on 20 April 1836. Having finally secured a proper job, Verdi wasted no time and married Margherita on 4 May 1836 in the Church of the Holy Trinity in Busseto. After a lavish lunch, the couple departed for a short honeymoon to Milan, and subsequently returned to settle in the Palazzo Tedaldi. Margherita was not merely a highly attractive woman she also was a decisive advocate of her husband’s career. By September 1836 Margherita was expecting, and Virginia Maria Luigia — the middle names chosen in reference to her two grandmothers — was born on 26 March 1837. Although happy in his family life, Verdi was determined to make his name in Milan. Margherita wrote, “Never, absolutely never, would he [Verdi] settle in Busetto. Having dedicated himself to theatre music, he would succeed in that and not in music for the church.”  

In 1838, Verdi publishes his first book of Sei Romanze (Six Romances), and his son Icilio Romano Carlo Antonio is born on 11 July. In August of that year, tragedy struck and little Virginia died of an unnamed childhood disease. Now more than ever, Verdi was determined to leave Busetto and he left for Milan with the manuscript score of Oberto in his back bag. Margherita and his young son soon followed. During rehearsals for Oberto, Icilio Romano unexpectedly fell ill and despite immediate medical intervention suddenly died on 22 October 1839. Verdi was devastated and soon lay ill himself for several weeks. Once he had recovered in May 1840, it was Margherita’s turn. According to medical opinion, she had contracted encephalitis and instead of getting better she was getting worse. Verdi sent for his father-in-law who barely managed to arrive hours before his daughter died aged 27. “From a dreadful disease, in the arms of her father, my beloved daughter, Margheretha, in the very flower of her youth. She was a faithful companion of the excellent young man, Giuseppe Verdi. I weep over this tragic loss.” And Giuseppe later recalled, “A third coffin goes out of my house. I was alone! Alone!”

Leonard Bernstein’s Young People’s Concerts (Born on August 25, 1918) Making Classical Music Irresistible

 by Georg Predota  August 25th, 2026

Can you name the longest-running series of family concerts of classical music in the world? If you grew up in the second half of the 20th century, this is probably not a really difficult question.

The answer, of course, is “The Young People’s Concerts” with the New York Philharmonic. That particular series dates back to conductor Frank Damrosch, who directed a concert aimed at a younger audience in 1898. It developed steadily over the decades, but it was Leonard Bernstein who transformed this series into a cultural phenomenon.

Leonard Bernstein (photo by Jack Mitchell)

As music director of the New York Philharmonic, Bernstein wrote, conducted, and narrated a total of 53 episodes from 1958 to 1972. Broadcast by CBS and syndicated in over 40 countries, the concerts brought classical music into the living rooms of the world. To celebrate Bernstein’s birthday on 25 August, let’s take a quick look at this extraordinary series that won five Emmy Awards and shared Bernstein’s excitement for music with generations of young people.   

When Bernstein Took the Stage

Leonard Bernstein, 1950s

We all know that Leonard Bernstein was the first American-born conductor to lead a major American symphony orchestra. He served as music director and chief conductor of the New York Philharmonic from 1958 to 1969. During his tenure, he did much more than conduct an orchestra. He basically opened the doors of the concert hall to millions of listeners and viewers.

In 1993, when Bernstein was looking back on the concerts, he wrote, “These concerts are not just concerts, not even in terms of the millions who view them at home. They are, in some way, the quintessence of all I try to do as a conductor, as a performing musician.”

“There is a lurking didactic streak in me that turns every program I make into a discourse, whether I utter a word or not; my performing impulse has always been to share my feelings, or knowledge, or speculations about music – to provoke thought, suggest historical perspective, encourage the intersection of musical lines.”

Lorne Munroe and Leonard Bernstein

“And from this point of view, the “Young People’s Concerts” are a dream come true, especially since the sharing is done with young people—that is, people who are eager, unprejudiced, curious, open, and enthusiastic. What more could an old incorrigible pedagogue ask for?” (Behind the Scenes, prelude, fugue & riffs, 1993)   

Music for Millions

Leonard Bernstein’s Young People’s Concerts

One of the most popular events in the history of classical music, the Young People’s Concerts greatly benefited from the relatively new medium of television. This new technology greatly transformed the reach of classical music, and the series became so popular that CBS moved it to prime time.

Bernstein’s charisma and teaching method were central to the success of the series. He never talked down to his young audience. Instead, he introduced genuine musical ideas but slightly aimed above what he assumed they could already understand.

Essentially, his goal was to make young people listen and enjoy themselves. He certainly never talked down to them, but he always approached them as serious listeners. And to be sure, the subjects were intellectually serious, including titles such as “What Does Music Mean?” and “What is American Music?”  

Making them Curious

Leonard Bernstein with a television camera

The primary reason Bernstein was so successful as a teacher and educator is that he did not make music easy for his listeners; he made them curious. Bernstein had a natural ability to remove all complexity and make it accessible through musical examples and direct engagement with the audience.

Instead of talking down to his audiences, he made them part of the process. Above all, Bernstein strongly believed that children were capable of understanding music on a variety of levels, and rather than watering down his introductions to classical music, he issued invitations to think about it.

Bernstein had a deceptively wonderful spontaneity in his appearances, but everything took an enormous amount of preparation. Regular evening subscription concerts of the Philharmonic frequently followed his Young People’s Concerts. Essentially, Bernstein would be in the hall in the early morning for television filming, demonstrations, and script revisions, and then conduct again in the evening.   

Music as Naturally as Food

Over 14 years and 53 performances, Bernstein’s celebrity, charisma, and zeal for learning transformed the series into a far-reaching phenomenon. Bernstein was certainly passionate about integrating music into children’s education from an early age.

He testified before the House Subcommittee on Select Education in 1977, saying, “I propose that the reading and understanding of music be taught to our children from the very beginning of their school life,” he said, “and that they learn to participate with enthusiasm in the study of music from kindergarten through high school.” Every child possesses a natural ability to understand music, he continued. Young people can and should engage with music “as naturally as food.”

Young People’s Concerts

For several generations, people heard an orchestra for the first time at the Young People’s Concerts. And to be sure, it laid the groundwork for countless remarkable musical journeys. It also showed Bernstein at his absolute best as a passionate conductor and teacher.

He was a symbol of the merger between high art and pop culture, and Bernstein viewed Western music as a larger continuum, a tapestry between the academic and the everyday. To be sure, Bernstein was an eccentric who desperately pined for respect as a composer in both popular and concert idioms. He was a classical figure who behaved like a rock star, making the stuffy world of classical music approachable to all.